Personal tools
cpu.013.html
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Issue: 013 CPU: Working in the Computer Industry 02/15/95
CPU is a moderated forum dedicated to sharing information among workers in the computer industry.
- CONTENTS
- ABOUT BOX
- /*COMMENTS*/
- LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
-
FEATURE: "The Truth About The Information Highway" By David Noble
-
FEATURE: "Telecommunications from Labor's Perspective"
- BOOK REVIEW: _The Jobless Future_
- BILLBOARD: Two conferences and a list
- TOOLBOX: Job board & RSI book
- LABOR BYTES: Miscellanea
- EOF: "There But for the Grace of God Go I"
1. ABOUT BOX
Online subscriptions to CPU are available at no cost by e-mailing listserv @ cpsr.org , with a single line in the message:
SUBSCRIBE CPSR-CPU
For example:
SUBSCRIBE CPSR-CPU Subcomandante Marcos
To cancel your subscription, send to listserv @ cpsr.org :
UNSUBSCRIBE CPSR-CPU
CPU back issues can be found via anonymous FTP at cpsr.org in the directory /cpsr/work.
PLEASE RE-POST THIS FREELY, especially at work. CPU material may be reprinted for non-profit purposes as long as the source is cited. We welcome submissions and commentary. Mail sent to the editors or to CPU will be treated as a "letter to the editor" and considered printable, unless noted otherwise.
Editors for this issue: Michael Stack and Jim Davis. We may be contacted by voice at (510) 601-6740, by email to cpu-owner @ cpsr.org , or by USPS at POB 3181, Oakland, CA 94609.
CPU is a project of the "Working in the Computer Industry" working group of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility / Berkeley Chapter (though views expressed herein are not necessarily those of CPSR).
2. /*COMMENTS*/
Computer programmers are strongly attracted to libertarianism. I was first struck by the connection a while back while looking through the list of candidates for the 1992 California state-wide elections. Almost all those running on a proclaimed libertarian platform declared their profession as computer programmer or software engineer or at the very least were connected in some direct manner to the computer industry. Ever since I've noticed the net awash in l-think.
While sometimes claiming they want government out of their private lives -- i.e. non-regulation of sexual and drug practise (all healthy sentiments) -- computer libertarians are most often heard championing the "free market" as the appropriate adjudicator of all relationships under the sun. Arguments usually finish weirdly with individuals making a strange transference defending corporate practise: the liberty to exploit labor and amass property and goods unencumbered by government interference... though, government must remain to guarantee property, even in cyberspace (see the Gingrich Magna Carta. Also see Winter '95 _Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed_ for an informative article on libertarianism).
A recent _Wall Street Journal_ article ("Libertarian Impulses Show Growing Appeal Among the Disaffected: When the Government fails, Many Voters Are Asking: Who Needs It Anyway?: Mixed Blessing for the GOP", 1/20/95) cited the national director of the Libertarian Party saying: "We have more members in one computer company in Seattle than in some whole counties, and that company is Microsoft." The article notes the strong association between libertarians and the computer industry and quotes a computer consultant and a computer-company president, each transported by coming technologies of digital cash and transaction encryptions, which will enable hiding business from government. Able to avoid taxation, they question representation.
The article goes on to draw out the implications. "The social consequences of such ideas are enormous... If the electronically empowered were able to amass income beyond the reach of the Internal Revenue Service, for instance, the burden of financing government functions that even libertarians consider essential -- national defense, the courts and foreign policy -- would fall inordinately on those who don't have the same technological sophistication." While we may argue the merits and demerits of State (particularly the current U.S. government, run by a two- faced Speaker all for welfare-for-lockheed-but-none-for-children), what we are really seeing here, I'd argue, is a technician's version of the rich securing themselves in new snow-crash cities, opting out of a wider tax-base, and generally detaching and/or insulating themselves from the tumbling majority.
Does learning a computer language somehow soften the brain and kill social identification with others? Does working those long hours square-eyed in front of a monitor make the rest of the world fade so all that remains is the computer and you? Marathon programming stints do tend to dehumanize, but most of us recover after a couple of hours.
Gary Chapman, writing in _New Republic_ (1/9-1/16) of the digital generation that "libertarian" WIRED magazine has "identified, courted and helped shape", says it "is [a generation] that seems to have grown up without any civic obligations or significant hardships." Methinks this is at the root of the libertarian impulse.
St.Ack
3. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Lucas Gonze
Just wanted to respond to one of the letters to the editor...
[written by Jean Renard Ward, in CPU.012]
>The argument that technologies and standards in computing change
Point taken, but the pace of change in technology isn't the best
reason to say certification is impossible. Good programmers
accumulate data on how given technologies work (for example,
operating systems) on the fly. What makes them good is completely
different: 1) handling logic puzzles and 2) creative problem
solving. Both of these are general "inclinations" as opposed to
specific skills, and because of this, both defy testing.
>Physicians are both professionally unionized, and certified by
Physician certification encourages doctors to be correct instead
of insightful. Good programmers tend to be the other way around.
>Engineers __are__ professionally unionized and certified in
True, but the European software industry is a bust. Flaky,
undependable, uncertified American software engineers seem to be
what the market wants.
[Sigh. We suggest you review back issues of CPU, and notice that
the software industry is a global industry. It would appear that
what the "market" wants is easy to hire-and-fire, cheap,
dependable, available, expert engineers, whether they be Irish,
French, Indian, Russian or American (and all points in-between).
The U.S. certainly doesn't have a corner on that market, and we as
programmers are dead in the water if we think so. As to the other
points, why do employers require programmer's to have particular
language skills, expertise in particular narrow areas and X years
of experience if the trade is all "insight" to be picked up "on
the fly." The letter writer seems to have a romantic notion of
the programmer's trade, as most of it is rote, with the practice
of insight the exception rather than the rule.-- Eds.]
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Roxburgh <JR1700@UCSFVM.UCSF.EDU>
In re: John Desmond's letter to the editor in
CPU 012, regarding
the use of "inappropriate" language, I must respectfully disagree.
The purpose of publishing a paper or article is to communicate
information to the reader. Logically, the writing style should be
judged according to how well (or how poorly) it supports this
goal, and not according to the degree of its conformity to some
arbitrary standard.
To illustrate: The latest (v.1 n.48) issue of INFOSYS, perhaps the
archetype of a "respectable on-line publication," includes the
following among a list of working papers which are currently
available from the Department of Information Systems at the City
Polytechnic University of Hong Kong:
94/28 Miss Linda Lai
The title of the article which so aroused Mr. Desmond's wrath was:
PISS-POT: CONTRACTOR REFUSES TEST, LOSES JOB
Not to put too fine a point on it -- as I have the greatest
respect and admiration for someone willing to write academic
papers in a language other than their first -- which of these two
pieces promises to deliver its informational load succinctly,
cogently, and in a manner accessible to ordinary humans; and which
seems more likely to be a highly effective cure for insomnia?
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Glenn.S.Berman@CONRAIL
I was just forwarded a copy of 'CPU' & it looks great.
I just wanted to alert you that your reference 2 prof.
organizations, IEEE & ACM only mentioning the availability of
group insurance through them. Obviously, prof. orgs. serve other
purposes... education, publications, networking, discounts on
insurance & car rentals, etc.
I am President of the Montgomery County Chapter (PA, outside
Phila.) of the Data Processing Management Association. We're an
international organization, which has been around for over 30
years. Our membership is diverse, made up of programmers,
analysts, managers, vice presidents of I/S, directors, data
architecture people, PC & mainframe specialists, hardware &
software vendors, consultants & recruiters (or, if you prefer,
headhunters).
If you or any of your readers would like additional info, please
contact our Na office at (708) 825-8124, P.O. Box 978, Park Ridge,
IL 60068-0978.
Locally, we are planning a regional conference for May 11-12th
about the Inform Highway. It will be held at the Great Valley
(near Valley Forge) Hilton. It is a joint effort by us, Phila. and
2 other chapters in the area. Our region consists eastern PA, DE,
MD, northern VA & Washington, D.C.
DPMA has a Compuserve forum for I/S professionals to exchange
ideas and help solve each others' problems.
Additionally, our organization are members of the Institute for
Certification of Computing Professionals. This is the organization
which conducts the CDP tests. ACM, ASM, ACW, BDPA, CIPS, ICCA,
COMMON, ISTE & MMA are all constituent societies. If you'd like
more info about certification, about which you published a letter
to the editor [in CPU 012], ICCP may be reached at: (708) 299-
4227, 2200 E. Devon Ave., Suite 2 Des Plaines, IL 60018-4503.
Glenn S. Berman
by David Noble
At the end of November, the truth about the information highway
finally got out. Protesting the announcement of another 5600
layoffs, 1200 Bell-Atlantic employees in Pennsylvania wore T-
shirts to work which graphically depicted themselves as
Information Highway Roadkill. The layoffs were just the latest
round of cutbacks at Bell-Atlantic, which have been matched by the
elimination of jobs at the other giants of the telecommunications
industry -- ATT, NYNEX, Northern Telecom -- supposedly the very
places where new jobs are to be created with the information
highway. In reality, the technology is enabling companies to
extend their operations and enlarge their profits while reducing
their workforce, and the pay and security of those who remain, by
contracting out work to cheaper labor around the globe and by
replacing people with machines. The very workers who are
constructing the new information infrastructure are among the
first to go, but not the only ones. The same fate is facing
countless workers in manufacturing and service industries in the
wake of the introduction of these new information technologies.
What is most striking about the Bell-Atlantic episode is not just
the provocative fashion statement of the workers, members of
Communication Workers of America District 13. Rather, it was the
company's exaggerated response. Bell Atlantic demanded that the
workers remove the T-shirts and when they refused, their employer
suspended them without pay. According to Vince Maison, president
of the union, the employer suspended the employees out of
expressed fear that their message would be seen by the public.
Significantly, management was concerned about adverse publicity
not just for Bell Atlantic but, more importantly, for the
information highway itself. This was the first time the
information highway was unambiguously linked with unemployment, by
a union and workforce presumably best situated to reap its
promised benefits. Apparently the company believed there was too
much riding on the information highway bandwagon to allow this
sober message to get around. But it did anyway. The (probably
illegal) management action backfired. Rather than a few hundred
customers catching a glimpse of the T-shirts during the course of
the day's work, millions throughout North America saw them through
the media coverage of the suspensions; within hours, the union was
inundated with phone calls of support and orders for the T-shirts.
The truth was out.
By now probably everyone has heard of the information highway, as
a result of the massive propaganda blitzkrieg of the last year.
Announcements heralding the dawn of a new age emanate incessantly
and insistently from every quarter. The media gush with the
latest info highway traffic reports (but not the fatalities), all
levels of government are daily pressured into diverting public
monies into yet another private trough, every hi-tech firm, not to
mention every hustler and con artist in the business and academic
worlds is rushing to cash in on the manufactured hysteria. The
aggressive assault on our senses is aimed at securing public
support and subsidy for the construction of the new commercial,
infrastructure. Its message, which has become the mind-numbing
multinational mantra, is simple and direct: We have no other
choice. Our very survival, it is alleged as individuals, a
national, a society, depend upon this urgent development. Those
without it will be left behind in the global competition. And
those with it? A recent "Futurescape" advertisement supplement to
the _Globe and Mail_ by Rogers Cantel and Bell Canada warned that
the information highway "raises the ante in competition. If we
don't act, Canada and Canadian companies will be left behind....
the information highway is not a luxury technology for the rich.
It is the way of the future. And those who do not get on the
highway will not have any way of reaching their ultimate
destination."
And what exactly is the destiny advanced by the information
highway? Ask the Bell-Atlantic employees. The propaganda never
mentions the roadkill, of course, but that is the future for many.
Most people in Canada instinctively seem to know this already.
According to a 1993 Gallup poll, 41% of those currently employed
believe they will lose their jobs. But, despite this intuition,
people have been terrorized into a hapless fatalism. It's
inevitable. Or else they have been seduced by the exciting array
of new tools and diversions: home-shopping, home-videos, home-
learning, home-entertainment, home-communication. The operative
word is home, because home is where people without jobs are -- if
they still have a home. The focus is on leisure, because there
will be a lot more of it, in the form of mass unemployment (Some
lucky few will get home-work, as their job takes over their home
in the sweatshops of the future). This is where we are headed on
the information highway.
To see where we are headed requires no voodoo forecasting,
futuristic speculation, much less federally-funded research. We
just need to take a look at where we've been, and where we are.
The returns are already in on the Information Age, and the
information highway promises merely more of the same, at an
accelerated pace.
In the wake of the information revolution (now four decades old --
the term cybernetics and automation were coined in 1947). People
are now working harder and longer (with compulsory overtime),
under worsening working conditions with greater anxiety, stress,
and accidents, with less skills, less security, less autonomy,
less power (individually and collectively), less benefits, and
less pay. Without question the technology has been developed and
used to deskill and discipline the workforce in a global speed-up
of unprecedented proportions. And those still working are the
lucky ones. For the technology has been designed above all to
displace.
Structural (that is, permanent and systemic as opposed to
cyclical) unemployment in Canada has increased with each decade of
the information age. With the increasing deployment of so-called
"labor-saving" technology (actually labor-cost saving) official
average unemployment has jumped from 4% in the 1950's, 5.1% in the
1960's, 6.7% in the 1970's, and 9.3% in the 1980's, to 11% so far
in the 1990's.
These, of course, are the most conservative estimates (actual
unemployment is closer to double these figures). Today we are in
the midst of what is called a jobless recovery, symptomatic and
symbolic of the new age. Output and profits rise without the jobs
which used to go with them. Moreover, one fifth of those employed
are only part-time or temporary employees, with little or no
benefits beyond barely subsistence wages, and no security
whatever.
In 1993, an economist with the Canadian Manufacturers Association
estimated that between 1989 and 1993, 200,000 manufacturing jobs
were eliminated through the use of new technology -- another
conservative estimate. And that was only in manufacturing, and
before the latest wave of information highway technology, which
will make past developments seem quaint in comparison.
None of this has happened by accident. The technology was
developed, typically at public expense, with precisely these ends
in mind by government (notably military), finance, and business
elites -- to shorten the chain of command and extend
communications and control (the military origins of the Internet),
to allow for instantaneous monitoring of money markets and funds
transfer, and to enable manufacturers to extend the range of their
operations in pursuit of cheaper and more compliant labor.
Thus as the ranks of the permanently marginalized and impoverished
swell, and the gap between rich and poor widens to 19th century
dimensions, it is no mere coincidence that we see a greater
concentration of military, political, financial, and corporate
power than ever before in our history. In the hands of such self-
serving elites -- and it is now more than ever in their hands --
the information highway, the latest incarnation of the information
revolution, will only be used to compound the crime.
Visions of democratization and popular empowerment via the net are
dangerous delusions; whatever the gains, they are overwhelmingly
overshadowed and more than nullified by the losses. As the
computer screens brighten with promise for the few, the light at
the end of the tunnel grows dimmer for the many.
No doubt there has been some barely audible and guarded discussion
if not yet debate about the social implications of the information
highway focusing upon such issues as access, commercial vs. public
control and privacy. There is also now a federal advisory
commission on the information highway although it meets in secret
without public access or scrutiny, doubtless to protect the
proprietary interests of the companies that dominate its
membership. But nowhere is there any mention of the truth about
the information highway, which is mass unemployment.
For decades we have silently subsidized the development of the
very technologies which have been used to destroy our lives and
livelihoods, and we are about to do it again, without debate,
without any safeguards, without any guarantees. The calamity we
now confront, as a consequence, rivals the upheaval of the first
industrial revolution two centuries ago, with its untold human
suffering. We are in for a struggle unlike anything any of us
have ever seen before, as the Bell-Atlantic employees testify, and
we must use any and all means at our disposal. It's time we came
to our collective senses, while there is still time. We must
insist that progress without people is not progress. At the very
least, as a modest beginning, we pull the public plug on the
Information Highway.
[David Noble is a professor at York University and a historian of
technology. He taught for nearly a decade at M.I.T. and was
curator of the industrial automation at the Smithsonian
Institution in Washington, DC. He is the author of numerous
books, including _Forces of Production: A Social History of
Industrial Automation_ (Oxford University Press) and, most
recently, _Progress Without People_ (a Canadian edition will be
published this spring by Between the Lines). He lives in Canada.]
[The following comes from the Telecommunication Policy
Roundtable's listserver, January 3, 1995 General Meeting Draft
Minutes. To subscribe to the TPR listserver, send the message SUB
ROUNDTABLE YOUR NAME to listserv@cni.org.]
_"Telecommunications from Labor's Perspective" - a presentation
by Debbie Goldman, Research Economist for the Communications
Workers of America.
Ms. Goldman presented a general overview of union efforts and
accomplishments in organizing within the evolving
telecommunications industry. Key highlights from her
presentation:
Book Review: THE JOBLESS FUTURE
I got this book for Christmas. I was given a gift certificate --
and though I'd been told the book wasn't that good -- the cheesy
fountain and mall-atmosphere at Berkeley Barnes & Noble was
bringing on a headache. I had to cash in my present fast.
This book ain't about no pork-chop. Its serious stuff. The
authors contend jobs -- work as we know it -- is going away. They
cite the tendency of new jobs to be part-time and/or temporary,
and often at minimum wage. Official unemployment figures fail to
measure the state of partial employment and those who have given
up looking for work. The authors mention the thousands of layoffs
at GM, IBM, Boeing, Kodak and Sears and that even "the older and
most prestigious professions of medicine, university teaching,
law, and engineering are in trouble: doctors and lawyers and
engineers are becoming like assembly-line clerks... proletarians"
(p. 54). The authors comment ":... we have yet to feel the long-
term effects on American living standards that will result from
the elimination of well-paid professional, technical and
production jobs" (p. xi).
The mass of layoffs and the destruction of high-quality, well-
paid, permanent jobs is produced by three closely related
developments:
"First in response to pervasive, long-term economic stagnation and
to new scientifically based technologies, we are experiencing
massive restructuring of patterns of ownership and investment in
the global market. Fewer companies dominate larger portions of
the world market in many sectors, and national boundaries are
becoming progressively less relevant to how business is done,
investment deployed and labor employed... Second, the relentless
application of technology has destroyed jobs and, at the same
time, reduced workers' living standards by enabling transnational
corporations to deterritorialize production... " and thirdly, U.S.
corporations are locating not only low-skilled jobs, but also
design and development activities in other countries such as India
and China where labor is both skilled and cheap (p 8-9).
Their thesis may be synopsized: "All of the contradictory
tendencies involved in the restructuring of global capital and
computer-mediated work seem to lead to the same conclusion for
workers of all collars -- that is, unemployment, underemployment,
decreasingly skilled work, and relatively lower wages. These sci-
tech transformations of the labor process have disrupted the
workplace and worker's community and culture. High technology
will destroy more jobs than it creates. The new technology has
fewer parts and fewer workers and produces more product. This is
not only in traditional production industries but for all workers,
including managers and technical workers...." (p. 3).
Commenting particularly on computer programmers: "The specific
character of computer-aided technologies is that they no longer
discriminate between most categories of intellectual and manual
labor. With the introduction of computer-aided software
programming (CASP), the work of perhaps the most glamourous of the
technical professions associated w/ computer technology --
programming -- is irreversibly threatened. Although the "real"
job of creating new and basic approaches will go on, the ordinary
occupation of computer programmer may disappear just like that of
the drafter, whose tasks were incorporated by computer-aided
design and drafting by the late 1980s. CASP is an example of a
highly complex program whose development requires considerable
knowledge, but when development costs have been paid and the price
substantially reduced, much low-level, routine programming will be
regulated to historical memory" (p. 21).
Arguing the above is the meat (& potatoes) of the book but
chapters are given over to exploring aspects of these
developments, particularly the commercialization of science and
the university (i.e. the subordination of knowledge to serve
profit-motives to the detriment of any other determinant).
Other chapters look at a city-planning office to study the effects
CAD has had on the city-drafters and designers over the years;
unions and their experience organizing "professionals" such as
doctors, teachers and lawyers; the university tiered, tracked and
tenure system; and recent writers on class (What!!! Class you
say?!).
The authors devote a chapter to class analysis because -- though
soft-pedaling -- they locate an important nexus of social change
in a "New Class" of knowledge workers (after the work of Alvin
Gouldner but with important qualifications), especially as the
blue-collar worker and the service worker are replaced by
automation. They acknowledge that members of the new class have
"traditionally been the servant of corporate capital and the
state." But Aronowitz and DiFazio see that with the
proletarianization of knowledge workers described in their book --
and while capital still depends on their labor -- the new class
begins questioning their identification with an exploitative
ruling elite.
Here the authors' argument is weak. They say that computer
programmers etc. constitute a new class, yet at the same time --
while describing its disappearance -- they are arguing that they
really aren't that much different from their blue and pink collar
cousins. Why not look to those outside of production altogether --
the marginalized former factory workers, managers, operators, (and
yes, even programmers) etc., unemployed, or barely employed in
temp or part-time or minimum wage work, who have little or no
stake in the status quo -- as the "new class"?
An interesting couple of pages in _The Jobless Future_ traces the
origins of "The War on the Poor", talking of a changing perception
particularly amongst "liberals and leftist intellectuals" which
has seen the resurfacing of the English 18th century ideal that
"moral character" is built by economic independence -- without
consideration that a (growing) unemployable class has no hope of
participating in a shrinking labor market.
In the last chapter, the authors suggest some "pathways" for the
future, taking into account presuppositions of their book study.
"In addition, our proposals assume the goal of assuring the
_possibility_ of the full development of individual and social
capacities" (p. 343). Things they argue for: The need to reduce
working hours; regulating capital to prevent capital flight;
education as a right rather than a privilege (particularly
poignant in "knowledge" times); a guaranteed income; a new
research agenda steered away from profit to human motives and so
on. They argue that we need to go beyond "full employment" towards
"no employment" -- through the steps of shorter work weeks,
redistributed work load, and so forth, and work to set things up
so that such is possible.
Aronowitz and DiFazio's argument for a jobless future is
convincing. It's recommended reading for those trying to get a
handle on the changing workplace and its social fall-out. Their
book also seems to have arrived into a spate of no-future-for-work
commentary. There's the FutureWork list (see below). There is
also Breecher writing in _Z Magazine_, a recent _Business Week_
article on the "Re-Thinking Work", a _Fortune_ cover story on "The
End of the Job", the Canadian book _Shifting Time_ by Armine
Yalnizyan, T. Ran Ide & Arthur J. Cordell, and the new book by
Jeremy Rifkin, _The End of Work_.
In the face of these observations and predictions, nothing is
being done to address the social dislocation upon us (unless you
count prison construction) when the agency by which humans obtain
necessities -- through sale of their skills and abilities -- is
going away. Even worse, as Aronowitz and DiFazio remark at the
start of their book, a grand delusion is in operation "as experts,
politicians, and the public become acutely aware of new problems
associated with the critical changes in the economy -- crime,
poverty, homelessness, hunger, education downsizing, loss of tax
revenues to pay for public services, and many other social issues
-- the solution is always the same: jobs, jobs, jobs" (p. xi).
St.Ack
------------------------------------------------------------------
The one-day conference will deal with new information technology's
effect on workers and unions. Open to members of Ontario
Federation of Labor affiliates. Call John Anderson at 416-441-
2731 for more information and location.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The conference will focus on the impact of the Technology
Revolution on economic life, and it's social consequences. How
new technologies can be deployed to raise everyone's standard of
living. Community & union activists encouraged. To participate
in discussions around the conference and conference issues, join
the JOB-TECH mailing list. Send the following message:
SUBSCRIBE JOB-TECH
to listserv@uic.edu.
For more information, mail jdav@mcs.com or call 312-996-5463
Jeremy Rifkin (author of _The End of Work_) will give the keynote
on Thursday, March 2, 7:30 pm. Email jdav@mcs.com for more info.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This tidbit about the bigger computer industry picture was in a
recent Futurework post:
"I am an American and received engineering degrees from MIT and
Stanford. For most of the past 8 years I have lived in Southeast
Asia, either in Thailand or Singapore ... and for more than one
year now I have been working for an American computer parts
manufacturer in Thailand. The company is called Read-Rite.
"The future of work is often epitomized by the situation I am in.
Our headquarters are in California (Milpitas). We have 1000 people
in California, 8,800 in Thailand, 6,000 in the Philippines, 2,000
in Malaysia, 400 in Japan, and 20 in Singapore. The products we
make (thin film magnetic recording heads for hard drives) were
developed initially with hundreds of scientists and engineers at
IBM in the early 80's. Now, we make millions of them yearly with a
labor force that consists primarily of 18 to 25 year old high
school graduates in developing countries."
INTERNET WWW JOB BOARD: ADION Information Service's "Monster
Board" has good pictures and a bunch of job listings. You can
actually apply on-line. Most of the opportunities are in the
north-east (which would explain why my search on Software-
Engineering jobs in California only turned up two openings). It
is free at http://www.monster.com.
Email jtaylor@monster.com. (From PR Newswire Boston, 12/05/94).
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tammy Crouch (TMC909@aol.com) writes CPU:
Here's info on my first book on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The second
book won't be out till later this year.
Title: "Carpal Tunnel Syndrome & Overuse Injuries: Prevention,
Treatment and Recovery"
This book shows how alternative therapies can enlarge the range of
treatment choices beyond medication, cortisone injections, and
surgery. Helps patients make the necessary changes in lifestyle,
diet and attitude to recover from and even prevent repetitive
stress injuries. Specific chapters cover ergonomics and computers,
exercise, stress reduction, and much more.
JOBS: BORLAND is to cut 40% of its world-wide work force. The
reduction from 1,700 to 1,040 workers is to be completed by June.
(_WSJ_, 1/18/95) Meanwhile, Borland founder and still-chairman
Philippe Kahn is taking up some of the slack in a new venture he
is starting, called STARFISH SOFTWARE -- it will hire 30 people.
(_New York Times, 2/10/95) 3D0 fired somewhere between "single
digits" and 50 of its 300 workers the week before Christmas
(_SFC_, 12/20/95). PRODIGY, the SEARS/IBM computer information
service founded in the mid-1980s, is cutting its workforce by 15%
laying of about 100 of its nearly 700 employees. In 11 years
Prodigy has consumed more than $1 billion of its parents' money
without turning a dime of profit. The _NYT_ suggests that new tech
is partly to blame: HTML and other software tools allow
individuals and businesses to create for themselves some of the
services that Prodigy used to have to provide for them. (_WSJ_,
12/6/94, _NYT_ 12/6/94). UNISYS, the perpetrators of the recent
GIF tiff on COMPUSERVE, will cut 4,000 jobs worldwide. The
company has cut one-third of its workforce since 1990 (Atlanta
Journal-Constitution 12/30/94). The next day after that
announcement, Unisys announced the formation of a fully-owned
subsidiary in India. According to Newsbytes (1/4/95) the
subsidiary, to be known as Unisys India Ltd., will be fully
operational by March, 1995... Some 1,400 TANDY employees could
lose their jobs when Tandy shuts down its Video Concepts and
McDuff retail outlets (Newsbytes, 1/3/95).
TELECOM: Some more notes on the Bell-Atlantic "Road Kill" layoffs.
BELL ATLANTIC paid Chief Executive Officer Raymond W. Smith
$2,462,800 in salary, bonuses and stock options in 1993. The next
four executive officers split $3,434,600. Bell Atlantic's value
has increased 211 percent over the last five years. While the
telephone industry was once 90 percent unionized, the multi-media
industry is perhaps 35 percent organized. (Workers World Service
12/4/94) MERCURY COMMUNICATIONS LTD., the second largest British
telephone company, plans to reduce its work force of 11,500 by
about one third. All of the cuts are expected by the end of 1995.
(LABOR-L 12/6/94)
FACTS AND MYTHS: The November '94 issue of _IEEE Spectrum_
completed a series on engineering employment with an article on
"Layoffs: Myths and Facts." This last article has a U.S. focus
and illustrates its previous claims with personal stories of
engineers. Spectrum reports that while many indicators suggest
that an economic recovery is under way, layoffs in high-technology
companies are continuing. Not only are permanent jobs scarce, but
a lot of vacant ones pay 10-50 percent less than such positions
paid only a few years ago, and may also demand relocation.
"Moreover, according to at least one observer, the full-time job
itself may be disappearing as a way of structuring work."
(Thanks to Jeff Johnson for pointing us at the article).
HOW LEAN IS MY VALLEY: Silicon Valley is 15 percent healthier than
it was a year ago according to a new index developed by a public-
private organization, "Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network",
cited in the _San Francisco Chronicle_ (1/9/95).
The area surveyed -- Santa Clara county, parts of San Mateo,
Alameda county (to Fremont/Newark) and Santa Cruz county (to
Scotts Valley) with a population of 2 million -- gained an
estimated 5,600 jobs last year after losing about 25,000 jobs from
1991 to 1993. "The paradox is that companies are more productive
but they are doing it with fewer people," said Rebecca Morgan,
president of JVSVN. Other findings are that software has emerged
as the largest job generator but growth in four key industries,
including software, was not enough to compensate for the loss of
17,332 defense jobs and 11,775 semiconductor jobs during the same
period. Despite the net decline, work that remains is generally
high-skill, high-pay.
Women and minority workers are making some progress. Between 1980
and 1990, the number of women managers more than doubled, to
59,933 from 28,858. The number of female engineers nearly
tripled, to 12,236 from 4,399. Minority managers more than
doubled to 32,642 from 13,534 and minority engineers shot to
21,874 from 8,405. By comparison, all managerial jobs in Santa
Clara County increased 53 percent during the same period and
engineering jobs grew by 62 percent [Why didn't this article give
minorities and women as percentages also? - Ed.]. Despite the
region's wages and wealth, charitable giving is below-average.
Though the San Jose area ranks third in personal income, it ranks
39th in charitable giving. The study shows corporate giving isn't
much better.
DEMAND FOR PH.D.s: Although the number of scientists with Ph.D.s
keeps rising every year, job prospects for them keep dropping.
More than 12 percent of new Ph.D.s in math had no jobs after
graduation, and there is a 20-year high in joblessness among
chemists. The trends suggest that the future for most American
scientists lies in industry rather than in traditional academic
research and teaching. (_Newsweek_ 12/5/94, from _INNOVATION_
12/12/94. _INNOVATION_ is published once each week, with
individual subscriptions available at $15 a year. To subscribe to
Innovation, send the word "subscribe" in the body (not subject!)
of a mail message to: Innovation-Request@NewsScan.COM)
RSI: The Labor Department reports that repetitive stress injuries
are up almost 10% over last year, with 302,000 workers claiming
problems. In 1984, only 34,700 U.S. workers reported RSI injuries.
(Investor's Business Daily 12/28/94). A former administrative
assistant at a Minnesota high school is suing IBM for more than
$50,000, claiming she developed RSI from using an IBM keyboard.
Apple Computer Inc. is also a defendant in the case. The two
companies have denied the allegations, saying that the claimant's
injuries are the result of her own negligence. (_Tampa Tribune_
1/3/95).
HOLY SLAVE-LABOR: Bad enough competing with slave wages in the
maquiladoras or Chinese (or American) prisons -- now the Roman
Catholic Church is in on the game. 30 monks and nuns at six
monasteries have turned their hands to new tasks on computers,
including entering and checking data for publications, indexes and
library catalogs. According to Edward M. Leonard, the president of
Electronic Scriptorium Ltd., "The younger monks just love it.
They see the computer as an extension of the monastery and
something holy." [? - Ed] The head librarian for the Amherst
County Public Library, said Electronic Scriptorium's $12,000 bid
for converting its 32,000-card catalog was the lowest of three
bids it received last winter. She attributed Electronic
Scriptorium's "remarkably error-free" results to the lack of
distraction in the lives of the monks at the Monastery of the Holy
Cross in Chicago who handled that particular assignment. "They
were taking prayer breaks, not coffee breaks," she said. Leonard
said each monk earns an hourly wage of $8 to $12. (_SFC_ 1/9/95)
[Meanwhile, workers at the Vatican walked off of their jobs
recently, complaining that they hadn't received a pay increase in
eight years.]
IBM GERMAN UNIT LOSE IN COURT RULING OVER WORK HOURS -- IG Metall,
Germany's largest industrial union, said it won a court victory in
its dispute with an IBM subsidiary over working hours. IBM
Deutschland Informationssysteme GmbH cannot unilaterally impose a
38-hour workweek on IG Metall members. IG Metall's contract calls
for a 36-hour workweek.
The latest issue of _Resistor_, the newsletter of IBM Workers
United writes that 700 workers laid of at Endicot, Poughkeepsie
and Burlington are being replaced by essentially the same amount
of temporary workers. It also notes that computer programmers who
work as contractors for IBM in Austin, Texas claim IBM is using
low-paid programmers from India to replace higher paid American
workers according to an article in the Austin _American-
Statesman_. The Labor Department is investigating Tata
Information Systems, the employment firm responsible for hiring
Indian programmers for the US. The article's author remarks "But
we must remember that the temporary worker or the Indian
programmer is NOT the enemy. The enemy is corporate greed and the
designers of these policies who sit in the corporate board rooms
forcing wages down worldwide and trying to keep all of us at each
others throats."
[Thanks to Edupage/Educom for some of these pieces. Also thanks
to Sid Shniad for passing us material]
"[I]n Silicon Valley this week, there was widespread condemnation
of Intel's continuing refusal to acknowledge what outside experts
consider to be the true depth of the problem. And yet the
consensus among computer designers outside Intel seemed to be
sympathy for their technical colleagues inside the world's largest
chip maker.
"'Most of these guys think, "There but for the grace of God go
I,"' said Jerome Coonen, an independent computer designer who
helped develop the mathematical functions for Apple Computer
Inc.'s Macintosh computer. 'They think, "I'm lucky they haven't
found those wacky operations under my hood,"' Mr. Coonen added.
"Intel's Pentium foul-up can be traced to a tiny human error by an
unidentified designer at the company.
"The flaw that has mired the Pentium in controversy was created by
the simple omission of several lines of data from the software the
designers used to create the chip's transistors. That in turn
meant a handful of transistors were missing from the finished
chip..." (John Markoff, "A Harsh New Arena", _NYT_, 12/14/94)
CPU extends a hand of support to the Unidentified Designer: Sister
or Brother: Courage! We've been there too. We stand with you!
Web pages edited by
Dave Williams
Subject: RE: Certification for Professions in computing
>too fast for certification to work fails with at least one very
>obvious counter-example: [...]
>the state. [snip] It is also a highly technical field where
>technologies and basic medical understanding in the specialties
>change often.
>Europe.
Subject: Re: Inappropriate Language
Complementarity of Systems Enquiry and Data Analysis in
Information Systems Development
Subject: DPMA Contact
215-209-3633
4. FEATURE: THE TRUTH ABOUT THE INFORMATION HIGHWAY
5. FEATURE: TELECOMMUNICATIONS FROM LABOR'S PERSPECTIVE
6. BOOK REVIEW: THE FUTURELESS JOB
by Stanley Aronowitz & William DiFazio
University of Minnesota Press, 1994
7. CPU BILLBOARD:
CONFERENCE: UNIONS & THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY
03/02/95 (Ontario/Canada), sponsored by the Ontario Federation Of
Labor.
CONFERENCE: TECHNOLOGY, EMPLOYMENT AND COMMUNITY
03/03/95 - 03/04/95 Chicago, IL, sponsored by the Center for Urban
Economic Development, University of Illinois at Chicago.
FUTUREWORK is a list concerning work, income distribution, and
education under economic globalization and technological change.
Much of the input has been interesting though the volume tends to
overwhelm. Check it out. Send a "sub futurework your name"
message to
8. TOOLBOX: JOB BOARD & RSI BOOK
Author: Tammy Crouch with Dr. Michael Madden Publisher: North
Atlantic Books, 1992
Price: $9.95. ISBN: 1-55643-135-X
9. LABOR BYTES: MISCELLANEA
The myths and facts:
-- MYTH: Being at the cutting edge of technology makes an engineer
desirable.
-- MYTH: Having many talents will set an engineer apart from the
crowd.
-- MYTH: Skills learned in defense work can be easily converted to
civilian use.
-- FACT: Continuing education or reeducation will keep an engineer
employable.
-- FACT: Salaries of full-time engineers are falling.
-- FACT: Demand for temporary engineers is booming and
compensation is high.
10. EOF: "THERE BUT FOR THE GRACE OF GOD GO I"
CPSR is a nationwide public-interest organization
that examines the impact of technology on society.
P.O. Box 717
Palo Alto, CA 94302
415-322-3778
cpsr @ cpsr.org
Workplace Index
CPSR home page
E-mail webmaster
Last Updated: Thur 4 April 1996 10:20 PST
Created before October 2004